Please come by our office or call for particular items to enhance your health.

Better Health Through Soaking

from the Epsom Salt Council

Magnesium can be ingested as a nutritional supplement, but studies show that a wide variety of factors - the presence of specific foods or drugs, certain medical conditions, even the individual chemistry of a person's stomach acid - can interfere with their effectiveness. But all of the subjects in a recent study experienced increased magnesium levels from soaking in a bath enriched with magnesium sulfate crystals, commonly known as Epsom Salt.

Researchers and physicians report that raising your magnesium levels may:

• Improve heart and circulatory health, reducing irregular heartbeats, preventing hardening of the arteries, reducing blood clots and lowering blood pressure.

• Improve the body's ability to use insulin, reducing the incidence or severity of diabetes.

• Flush toxins and heavy metals from the cells, easing muscle pain and helping the body to eliminate harmful substances.

• Improve nerve function by regulating electrolytes. Also, calcium is the main conductor for electrical current in the body, and magnesium is necessary to maintain proper calcium levels in the blood.

• Relieve stress. Excess adrenaline and stress are believed to drain magnesium, a natural stress reliever, from the body. Magnesium is necessary for the body to bind adequate amounts of serotonin, a mood-elevating chemical within the brain that creates a feeling of well being and relaxation.

While increasing your magnesium levels, Epsom Salt also delivers sulfates, which are extremely difficult to get through food but which readily absorb through the skin. Sulfates serve a wide variety of functions in the body, playing a vital role in the formation of brain tissue, joint proteins and the mucin proteins that line the walls of the digestive tract. Sulfates also stimulate the pancreas to generate digestive enzymes and are believed to help detoxify the body's residue of medicines and environmental contaminants.

Milk Thistle: Safe and Effective Around Chemotherapy?

By Kerry Bone, BSc (hons), Dipl. Phyto.

Milk thistle (Silybum marianum), especially as the concentrated extract containing a defined level of the silymarin complex of flavanolignans, is being increasingly prescribed by herbal clinicians around cancer chemotherapy.

It is mainly being used to assist recovery after chemotherapy, for liver protection during chemotherapy and to ameliorate any long-term effects of cancer treatment.¹ The aim is to not only improve quality of life, but also to favorably affect treatment outcomes, since the patient might be able to better tolerate chemotherapy at the optimum dose.

However, concerns are often expressed in the mainstream medical literature that herbs (especially antioxidant herbs) should not be used in conjunction with chemotherapy because they might compromise cytotoxic effects on cancer cells.  Also, there is the added concern for milk thistle that its detoxifying properties might lead to increased clearance of cancer drugs.

A recently published clinical trial is an encouraging development in this debate.  In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 50 children (1 to 21 years of age) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were randomly assigned to receive a proprietary milk thistle extract or placebo over a period of 28 days during maintenance chemotherapy.  Chemotherapy is frequently interrupted in the treatment of children with ALL because of liver toxicity, especially during the maintenance phase of treatment.  The extract contained only two compounds from the flavanolignan complex, namely silybin A and B (target dose for trial participants 5.1 mg/kg/day), together with soy phosphatidylcholine (to improve bioavailability).  The intravenous chemotherapy drugs administered to the children included vincristine, prednisone, methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine.  No significant differences in frequency of side effects, incidence and severity of toxic reactions, infections or liver parameters were observed at the end of the trial (day 28).

However, by day 56 the milk thistle group had a significantly lower AST (p = 0.05) and a trend toward a significantly lower ALT (p = 0.07) compared to baseline.  AST in the treatment arm was also significantly different to placebo at day 56 (p = 0.04).  Although not significant, chemotherapy doses had to be reduced in 61 percent of the milk thistle group, compared to 72 percent for placebo.  These results occurred despite the relatively poor treatment compliance: adherence to milk thistle treatment was just 68 percent, versus 96 percent for placebo (p = 0.02).  Younger children exhibited better compliance than teenagers.  The concurrent use of milk thistle did not appear to compromise the activity of the chemotherapy drug cocktails.

There is an earlier case study from 1993 in which milk thistle extract (800 mg/day) was given to a 34-year-old female patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia.³  Maintenance chemotherapy for this type of leukemia with drugs such as methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine also leads to potential problems with liver toxicity.  The patient was started on such a regime, but therapy was only intermittent due to her elevated liver enzymes.  During four months of milk thistle treatment in combination with maintenance chemotherapy, liver enzymes were maintained at normal levels for the first time ever for this patient.  From this case study it might be reasonably concluded that high-end doses of a normal milk thistle extract (as opposed to a combination with soy phosphatidylcholine) should also be able to counter chemotherapy toxic effects.

There have been several clinical studies published in the past decade that have sought to understand any potential interaction of milk thistle extract with prescribed drugs.  The majority of studies have found no or minimal interaction.  Perhaps surprisingly, given that the herb is regarded as a "detoxifying" agent, any significant effects that have been demonstrated generally reflect on decreased, not increased, drug metabolism.

One highly relevant study evaluated the impact of milk thistle on human cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity using various probe drug cocktails.⁴  Milk thistle extract (350 mg/day standardized to 80 percent silymarin) for 28 days had no impact on CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4.  These CYP enzymes are involved in the metabolism of many common drugs, including those used in cancer chemotherapy, CYP3A4 is especially important.  A meta-analysis of three trials involving concurrent use of milk thistle (450 to 525 mg/day of a typical 80 percent silymarin extract for 12 to 28 days) and the anti-HIV drug indinavir found no impact on drug levels.⁵ Milk thistle (600 mg/day of an 80 percent silymarin extract) for four or 12 days had no impact on the metabolism of the anticancer drug irinotecan in six cancer patients.⁶

By studying the herb bioavailability and drug metabolites, the authors concluded that silybin concentrations in plasma were too low to significantly affect the function of the phase I enzyme CYP3A4 and the phase II enzyme UGT1A1.  They noted that irinotecan is highly susceptible to CYP3A4 inhibition (which silymarin demonstrates in vitro) and concluded that the herbal extract "poses little risk of interfering with the pharmacokinetic profile of chemotherapeutic agents that are substrates for CYP3A4 and UGT1A1." A similar conclusion (that milk thistle is not a potent CYP3A4 inducer) was reached after a short-term study of the impact of the herbal extract on the calcium-channel-blocking drug nifedipine in 16 healthy male volunteers.⁷

Interference with transporter proteins such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp) can also result in significant herb-drug interactions, as is the case for St.  John's wort (Hypericum perforatum).  In this context it was found that 900 mg/day of milk thistle extract for 14 days had a small but non-significant impact on digoxin pharmacokinetics in 16 healthy volunteers.⁸ In contrast, an Indian study found that levels of the antibiotic drug metronidazole were significantly reduced by just 140 mg/day of milk thistle extract for nine days, due to suspected induction of intestinal and perhaps hepatic expression of P-gp and CYP3A4.⁹

This is the only human herb-drug interaction study for milk thistle that has found reduced drug levels, so clearly this study needs to be repeated.  Also, induction of P-gp was the proposed mechanism, in contrast with other studies that found inhibition of or no effect on this transporter (see immediately below and above).

A few studies have demonstrated increased drug levels.  For example, 420 mg/day of milk thistle extract (80 percent silymarin) for 14 days increased levels of the beta-blocker talinolol by around 36 percent.¹⁰  Inhibition of P-gp was suggested as a possible mechanism.  The same authors also found that milk thistle extract at the same dose appeared to inhibit the metabolism of the hypotensive drug losartan in individuals with a particular CYP2C9 genotype.¹¹ Two other studies have shown reduced clearance of ornidazole¹² and sirolimus.¹³

Hence, the majority of human clinical herb-drug interaction studies show that milk thistle is not likely to interfere with drug metabolism.  If it does interact at all, this typically results in increased, not reduced, drug levels.  Also it should be noted that the occasional effects observed on P-gp induction are not likely to impact on levels of intravenously administered drugs.  Clearly, the possibility that milk thistle will reduce the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs by increasing their clearance from the body is rather unlikely based on current evidence.  While it might instead result in increased drug levels, such an effect is not likely to be large for the more aggressive doses used during intravenous chemotherapy.  However, for added safety milk thistle extract is probably best used in conjunction with other non-specific antitoxic herbs such as adaptogens.

A final point worth noting is the existence of several in vitro studies that show the silymarin complex potentiates the action of chemotherapeutic drugs on cancer cells.  For example, silymarin exerted synergistic effects on the antiproliferative activities of doxorubicin and paclitaxel in both sensitive and (at higher silymarin concentrations) multidrug-resistant (MDR) colon cancer cells.14 Silymarin is a known inhibitor of cellular MDR pumps that confer resistance to toxins and, in the case of bacteria, antibiotics.  It also demonstrated antiproliferative activity on its own.¹⁴ Hence, the upside is that milk thistle might not just be a passive bystander during cancer chemotherapy.  At the very least, these studies cast doubt on the proposition that the herb will reduce the cytotoxic activity of chemotherapeutic drugs.

References

1. Greenlee H, Abascal K, Yarnell E, et al.  Integr Cancer Ther, 2007;6(2):158-65. 

2. Ladas EJ, Kroll DJ, Oberlies NH, et al.  Cancer, 2010;116(2):506-13. 

3. Invernizzi R, Bernuzzi S, Ciani D, et al.  Haematologica, 1993;78(5):340-1. 

4. Gurley BJ, Gardner SF, Hubbard MA, et al.  Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2004;76(5):428-40. 

5. Mills E, Wilson K, Clarke M, et al.  Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2005;61(1):1-7. 

6. van Erp NPH, Baker SD, Zhao M, et al.  Clin Cancer Res, 2005;11(21):7800-6. 

7. Fuhr U, Beckmann-Knopp S, Jetter A, et al.  Planta Med, 2007;73(14):1429-35. 

8. Gurley BJ, Barone GW, Williams DK, et al.  Drug Metab Dispos, 2006;34(1):69-74. 

9. Rajnarayana K, Reddy MS, Vidyasagar J, et al.  Arzneim-Forsch Drug Res, 2004;54(2);109-13. 

10. Han Y, Guo D, Chen Y, et al.  Xenobiotica, 2009;39(09):694-9. 

11. Han Y, Guo D, Chen Y, et al.  Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2009;65(6):585-91. 

12. Repalle SS, Yamsani SK, Gannu R, et al.  Acta Pharma Sci, 2009;51(1):15-20. 

13. Jiao Z, Shi XJ, Li ZD, et al.  Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2009;68(1):47-60. 

14. Colombo V, Lupi M, Falcetta F, et al.  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2010 Apr 30.  [Epub ahead of print.]

Kerry Bone is a practicing herbalist; co-founder and head of research and development at MediHerb; and principal of the Australian College of Phytotherapy.  He also is the author of several books on herbs and herbal therapy, including Principles and Practice of Phytotherapy and The Essential Guide to Herbal Safety

Kidney Failure

During the first part of 2010,  my kidney function decreased to approximately 38%  for one four-month monitoring period.  I continued with the supplement even though the kidney doctor told me that he didn’t think it would do any good.  He said the supplement would not harm me, and that he had no objection to my using it.  Since that one low point of approximately 38%, my kidney function has steadily increased through the last exam in January, 2011.  I am now back to approximately 54% of normal filtering.  I continue to believe that the supplement has allowed me to maintain my disease at a level below medical intervention, and I can highly recommend Dr. Hank to properly administer the correct dosages of the supplement to aid in the treatment of kidney disease.  Ken Cayce, Arlington, TX, 2/25/2011